The topic to be studied should be the first issue to be solved.But before you set out to write a paper, there are two important things you should do that will set the groundwork for the entire process. Next, I'll review each step in more detail. Compose a concise and descriptive Title.This is because, if the discussion is insufficient, how can you objectively demonstrate the scientific significance of your work in the introduction? Finalize the Results and Discussion before writing the introduction. While this is the published structure, however, we often use a different order when writing. The main text is followed by the Conclusion, Acknowledgements, References and Supporting Materials. Introduction: What did you/others do? Why did you do it?.The article text follows the IMRAD format, which responds to the questions below: Along with offering peer review and bringing your articles up to the required linguistic standard, a scientific editor can also take a third-party objective view of your research.When you organize your manuscript, the first thing to consider is that the order of sections will be very different than the order of items on you checklist.Īn article begins with the Title, Abstract and Keywords. This is one way in which scientific paper editing services can help improve the publication process. A scientific editor should be able to provide you with an unbiased, external review in order to identify any ambiguities or more serious problems and provide suggestions for improvement. Scientific paper editing is about more than just polishing the language of your manuscript. How do you think the scientific community will react to your research article?.Does your research article include any wishy-washy language such as “it appears that…” or “this gives the impression that…?”.Have you used the correct voices and tenses throughout?.Are your figures and tables all relevant and clear?.Are the materials, variables, and techniques you used all explained succinctly and accurately?.Do your conclusions accurately reflect the questions you posed and all the findings of your research?.Does your article clearly show where others’ work ends and yours begins?.Are the objectives relevant to your intended audience?.Before you go ahead and complete your first revision to the text be sure to ask yourself the following nine questions: When you finish putting your first draft down on paper it’s time to step back and put yourself in the shoes of the scientific community reading your research for the first time. Self-Critical – Think about where your conclusions are uncertain and acknowledge where more research needs to be done (before someone else says it).Focused – Tell the story of your research, but keep your article concentrated on your results.Concrete – Avoid abstract or ambiguous phrases that could be misinterpreted use strong language that doesn’t leave room for doubt.Get your message across in the simplest way possible. Simple – Don’t try to impress with complex examples.Short – Avoid repeating yourself, and take out lengthy explanations of banal topics.In addition, there are a number of steps scholars can take to streamline the publication process and increase their chances of acceptance to the journal of their choice. A scientific editor can provide publication support services and help researchers accomplish their goal to publish quickly in a respected journal. Often, time spent working on language revisions and formatting requirements can detract from other important work which we may have. For many researchers, it takes time to become familiar with the scientific writing style and formatting rules. Therefore, it is critical to consider scientific manuscript editing services if you want the editors to seriously consider your submission. Do you have important research to publish but need scientific editing to make sure that your paper is ready for publication? A study by Hugh Gosden entitled 'Research Writing and NNSs: From the Editors,' published in the Journal of Second Language Writing, that included 116 academic editors, determined that among the chief reasons that research articles are rejected were an incorrect use of grammar, unclear text and incoherent development of the topic.

Editing scientific manuscripts